Court of Appeals of Maryland· 11/9/1973

Arnold v. Prince George's County

Citations

311 A.2d 223
270 Md. 285
1973 Md. LEXIS 684

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

requiring that a property owner, arguing that a statute was unconstitutional as applied to his property, first exhaust his administrative remedy
requiring a property owner, asserting that a zoning ordinance was unconstitutional as applied to his property, to exhaust his administrative remedy
requiring a property owner, asserting that a zoning ordinance was unconstitutional as applied to his property, to exhaust his administrative remedy
change in zoning as unconstitutional taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Barnes, McWilliams, Singley, Smith, Digges, Levine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.