Skip to main content

Armstrong v. State

Citations

  • 932 N.E.2d 1263
  • 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 1595
  • 2010 WL 3430498

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant “could have done a better job advancing his claim of lack of sufficient basis to preserve it for appeal” but that “because we prefer to address issues on their merits where possible, we will address the merits of Armstrong’s claim here”
  • noting our preference to address issues on their merits where possible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bailey, Kirsch, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.