Armstrong v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prosecutor’s argument was permissible because, among other reasons, it responded to the defendant’s contention pertaining to the question, under ORS 163.150(1)(b)(A), whether he had acted deliberately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).