Skip to main content

Armstead v. State

Citations

  • 549 N.E.2d 400
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 118
  • 1990 WL 10182

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant’s “resisting law enforcement convictions stem from the single affray with the police”
  • distinction made between separate offenses and one offense of resisting law enforcement—“unless more than one incident occurs,, there may be only one charge”
  • only one conviction of resisting permitted when defendant fought against three officers simultaneously

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Ratliff, Conover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.