Skip to main content
· 12/29/2005

Armenta v. Osmose, Inc.

Citations

  • 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460
  • 135 Cal. App. 4th 314
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 10
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 49
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1982

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • evidence that employer “was aware” it was underpaying its employees supported finding of willfulness despite ambiguity in the law
  • FLSA minimum wage standards different' from California’s significantly; employer violated minimum wage statute even if average of paid and unpaid hours exceeded minimum wage
  • “[A]ll hours 'worked must be compensated at the statutory or' agreed rate_

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.