· 12/29/2005
Armenta v. Osmose, Inc.
Citations
- 37 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460
- 135 Cal. App. 4th 314
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 10
- 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 49
- 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1982
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence that employer “was aware” it was underpaying its employees supported finding of willfulness despite ambiguity in the law
- FLSA minimum wage standards different' from California’s significantly; employer violated minimum wage statute even if average of paid and unpaid hours exceeded minimum wage
- “[A]ll hours 'worked must be compensated at the statutory or' agreed rate_
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coffee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.