Skip to main content
· 9/27/1965

Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Ponder

Citations

  • 239 Ark. 744
  • 393 S.W.2d 870
  • 1965 Ark. LEXIS 1072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a decree that dissolves a marriage but reserves a subsidiary issue for future determination is still a final decree for purposes of appeal
  • “the whole decree should nonetheless be held to go into effect when passed and be appealable, including the provision for change”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.