Baptist Health v. Circuit Court of Pulaski County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that any decision 11fias to whether the documents in question were privileged and should not have been ordered disclosed “would require us to delve into the underlying merits of the controversy, which this court has frequently held is improper in deciding whether to issue the writ”
• “The court also stated that it would review in camera any of the prior fall material deeméd by BHRI to be protected by the quality assurance or peer review statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).