Washington Supreme Court· 3/11/1913
Architectural Decorating Co. v. Nicklason
Citations
- 72 Wash. 415
- 130 P. 506
- 1913 Wash. LEXIS 1476
Syllabus
<p>Appeal — Judgment—Conclusiveness. Where an appeal, brought up on a short record, was affirmed, judgment entered as directed cannot be attacked by appellant on motion to vacate upon a showing of facts which appellant failed to present to the supreme court on the former appeal.</p>
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kath v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1909-06-11· cited 15×
- Architectural Decorating Co. v. NicklasonWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-08· cited 13×
- Kath v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1912-07-15· cited 8×
- Cochrane v. Van de VanterWashington Supreme Court· 1895-12-27· cited 6×
- Kelley v. SakaiWashington Supreme Court· 1913-03-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.