Skip to main content

Architectural Decorating Co. v. Nicklason

Citations

  • 66 Wash. 198
  • 119 P. 177
  • 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1040

Syllabus

<p>Mechanics’ Liens — Claim — Duplicate Statement — Material-men — Contractors. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1133, providing that no lien for materials shall be enforced unless duplicate statements shall be sent to the owner of all materials furnished to any person or contractor, applies only to materialmen and has no application to a lien claimed by a contractor furnishing both labor and materials for decorative plaster work under a contract with the owner through the owner’s agent.</p> <p>Same — Duplicate Statements — Materials Furnished to Owner. Rem. & Bal. Code, § 1133, requiring materialmen to furnish to the owner duplicate statements of all materials furnished to any person or contractor, has no application to materials furnished direct to the owner under a contract made by the owners agent.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Findings—Presumptions—Necessity op Exceptions. Where the evidence is not brought up, findings of fact, complete and sufficient as to every essential fact in the case, and not excepted to, are conclusive; and it cannot be assumed that the evidence supports the decree.</p>

Judges: Morris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Architectural Decorating Co. v. Nicklason

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.