Skip to main content
· 3/23/1987

Council of Middletown Township v. Benham

Citations

  • 523 A.2d 311
  • 514 Pa. 176
  • 1987 Pa. LEXIS 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]otal preemption is the exception and not the rule”
  • commenting that state legislature did not intend to preempt the entire field of waste regulation covered by SWMA
  • “[t]otal preemption is the exception and not the rule” and has been recognized only in three areas: alcoholic beverages, banking, and anthracite strip mining
  • \[t]otal preemption is the exception and not the rule\ and has been recognized only in three areas: alcoholic beverages, banking, and anthracite strip mining
  • “We have found an intent to totally preempt local regulation in only three areas: alcoholic beverages, banking and anthracite strip mining.”
  • \The state is not presumed to have preempted a field merely by legislating in it. The General Assembly must clearly show its intent to preempt a field in which it has legislated.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Hutchinson, Zappala, Papadakos, Larsen, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.