Araya v. Keleta

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have not squarely decided 19 whether such intangible contributions alone can create an equitable interest in real property.”
• “[W]e have not squarely decided 19 whether such intangible contributions alone can create an equitable interest in real property.”
• “[T]he Intrafamily Offenses Act ‘clearly envisions allowing safety concerns to trump property rights[,]’ which serve ‘as only one factor in the totality of circumstances.’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ALFREDO SALVATERRO v. ISELA RAMIREZ
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-15· cited 5×
• Ramirez v. Salvattera
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-07-23
• Macklin v. Johnson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-02-10

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. W. T. Grant Co.
  Supreme Court· 1953-05-25· cited 2,512×
• State Ex Rel. Williams v. Marsh
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1982-01-12· cited 136×
• Cruz-Foster v. Foster
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-17· cited 51×
• Hemily v. Hemily
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-25· cited 28×
• Ealey v. Ealey
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-08-14· cited 17×
• Sanders v. Sanders
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-02-04· cited 16×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-03· cited 14×
• Yeldell v. Yeldell
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-12-22· cited 13×
• Powell v. Powell
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-09· cited 11×