Arar v. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the INA’s thorough coverage of the admission, exclusion and removal of aliens “does not automatically lead to an adequate and meaningful remedy” for alleged constitutional violations
• citing, inter alia, Sepulveda v. Gonzales, 407 F.3d 59 (2d Cir.2005)
• discussing Arar’s brief in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss
• discussing Arar’s brief in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss
• discussing Arar's brief in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arar v. Ashcroft
  Second Circuit· 2009-11-02· cited 338×
• Arar v. Ashcroft
  Second Circuit· 2008-08-01· cited 101×
• Harbury Ex Rel. Estate of Bamaca-Velasquez v. Hayden
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-04-15· cited 101×
• Sissoko v. Rocha
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-15· cited 40×
• Wilson v. Libby
  District of Columbia· 2007-07-19· cited 19×
• Kivo v. Blumberg Exelsior, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2013-11-16· cited 5×
• Lizarbe v. Rondon
  D. Maryland· 2009-02-26· cited 4×
• Richards v. Napolitano
  E.D. New York· 2009-06-30· cited 4×
• Chowdhury v. Worldtel Bangladesh Holding, Ltd.
  E.D. New York· 2008-12-05· cited 2×
• Arar v. Ashcroft
  Second Circuit· 2008-06-30· cited 1×
• Sissoko v. Rocha
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-14