Aral v. Earthlink, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there 7 is “there is a substantial risk that a California fundamental public policy in favor of class 8 actions” (emphasis added)
• “Such ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ contracts of adhesion are frequently found to be oppressive under California law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).