Aral v. Earthlink, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there 7 is “there is a substantial risk that a California fundamental public policy in favor of class 8 actions” (emphasis added)
• “Such ‘take-it-or-leave-it’ contracts of adhesion are frequently found to be oppressive under California law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration Association
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-12-04· cited 1,006×
• Kinkel v. Cingular Wireless, LLC
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 190×
• Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-02-03· cited 187×
• David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-08-23· cited 96×
• Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-08-17· cited 92×
• APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2014-09-05· cited 85×
• Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-06-22· cited 61×
• Klussman v. Cross Country Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-12-15· cited 38×
• Cohen v. DirecTV, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-09-18· cited 35×
• Skot Heckman v. Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2024-10-28· cited 25×
• Beltran v. AuPairCare, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2018-10-30· cited 23×
• Loewen v. Lyft, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2015-09-15· cited 21×
• Levin v. Caviar, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2015-11-16· cited 21×
• Mance v. Mercedes-Benz USA
  N.D. California· 2012-09-28· cited 16×
• AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion
  Supreme Court· 2011-04-27· cited 8×
• Jackson v. S.A.W. Entertainment Ltd.
  N.D. California· 2009-05-21· cited 7×
• Omstead v. Dell, Inc.
  N.D. California· 2008-02-05· cited 5×
• Konig v. U-Haul Co. of California
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-12-19· cited 2×
• Galen v. Redfin Corporation
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-07-21
• Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-12-04

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 3,455×
• Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. Randolph
  Supreme Court· 2000-12-11· cited 1,972×
• Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-17· cited 1,405×
• Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams
  Supreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 1,312×
• Perry v. Thomas
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,187×
• Vasquez v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1971-05-10· cited 453×
• Discover Bank v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 2005-06-27· cited 370×
• Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.
  California Supreme Court· 2001-01-25· cited 364×
• Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 363×
• Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.
  California Supreme Court· 2000-08-09· cited 361×
• Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 2003-02-27· cited 245×
• Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans
  California Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 190×
• Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1976-07-12· cited 183×
• America Online, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-07-10· cited 159×
• Szetela v. Discover Bank
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-04-22· cited 159×
• Cal-State Business Products & Services, Inc. v. Ricoh
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-01-14· cited 85×
• Lu v. Dryclean-U.S.A. of California, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-12-29· cited 64×
• INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS, AG v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2002-12-10· cited 51×
• CQL Original Products, Inc. v. National Hockey League Players' Ass'n
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-11-03· cited 44×
• Net2Phone, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-09· cited 38×