Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 8/2/1991
Application of Hughes
Citations
- 594 A.2d 1098
- 1991 Me. LEXIS 194
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remand for reconsideration due to application of wrong standard of proof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Roberts, Glassman, Collins, Brody
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maine Eye Care Associates P.A. v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-02-17· cited 33×
- Petition of WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2010-11-23· cited 12×
- F. Lee Bailey v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-04-10· cited 10×
- In re SpurlingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-08-22· cited 7×
- In re T.J.S.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-04-03· cited 4×
- In re Malavet RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1994-05-02· cited 4×
- In re HughesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-06-10· cited 2×
- In re Petition of Gary M. Prolman for Reinstatement to the Bar of the State of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2022-04-14· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Mental RetardationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1984-08-14· cited 127×
- In the Matter of HissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-08-05· cited 104×
- In re KeenanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1943-09-14· cited 58×
- Application of FeingoldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1972-10-27· cited 40×
- Bureau of Taxation v. Town of WashburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1985-04-05· cited 5×
Other cases named Application of Hughes
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.