Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding merely that plaintiff did not have Article III standing while stating nothing about whether injury-in-fact is a low threshold
• finding MedIm- mune inapplicable where “the validity of the challenged pa- tents” would not affect the plaintiff’s “ongoing royalty obligations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Intel Corporation v. Qualcomm Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 2021-12-28· cited 36×
• Modernatx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2021-12-01
• Moderna Tx, Inc. v. Arbutus Biopharma Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2021-12-01
• Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 2021-11-10
• Bioparques De Occidente v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2022-04-14
• Best Medical International, Inc. v. Elekta Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2022-08-26
• Best Medical International, Inc. v. Elekta Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2022-08-29
• Sekri, Inc. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2023-06-01
• Platinum Optics Technology Inc. v. Viavi Solutions Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2024-08-16
• Linyi Chengen Import and Export Co., Ltd. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2026-04-29

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
• Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins
  Supreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 7,043×
• United States v. Locke
  Supreme Court· 2000-03-22· cited 468×
• Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee
  Supreme Court· 2016-06-20· cited 322×
• Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-12-13· cited 257×
• Prasco, LLC v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2008-08-15· cited 198×
• Harris Corporation v. Ericsson, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 139×
• In Re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Prods. Mktg., Sales Practices & Liab. Litig.
  Third Circuit· 2018-09-06· cited 124×
• United States v. Dubon-Otero
  First Circuit· 2002-05-29· cited 95×
• Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  Federal Circuit· 2014-06-04· cited 60×
• Communities Against Runway Expansion, Inc. v. Federal Aviation Administration
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 59×
• The B.V.D. Licensing Corporation v. Body Action Design, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1988-04-28· cited 52×
• Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2017-01-09· cited 51×
• Jtekt Corporation v. Gkn Automotive Ltd.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-08-03· cited 39×
• Automated Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. Lee
  Federal Circuit· 2015-04-10· cited 35×
• Avx Corporation v. Presidio Components, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-05-13· cited 22×
• General Electric Company v. United Technologies Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-07-10· cited 11×

Other cases named Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
  Federal Circuit· 2021-11-10