Apanovitch v. Houk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Brady “only applies to evidence that was known to the prosecution, but unknown to the defense, at the time of trial”
• recognizing that Brady “only applies to evidence that was known to the prosecution, but unknown to the defense, at the time of trial”
• rejecting sufficiency challenge and reciting the evidence relied on by the state court that included the petitioner’s “variety of inconsistent stories about his whereabouts on the night of the murder”
• the Brady rule only encompasses evidence known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense
• applying Fed. R. Evid. 803(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).