Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 1/19/1995

Antonious v. Muhammad

Citations

  • 873 F. Supp. 817
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 422
  • 1995 WL 19657

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prior state action precluded later federal action, notwithstanding new factual allegations “aris[ing] from a related series of transactions”
  • noting that the Brown court did not dismiss plaintiff's state claims without prejudice in response to defendants' dispositive motion, but rather did so only when plaintiff failed to proceed to trial and it moved for a voluntary discontinuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprizzo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.