Arthur B. Powers v. Glenn E. Coe and Austin J. McGuigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• arguing “[t]he finding in the R&R that the [TAC] adequately pled personal involvement of . . . Spota . . . sets an impractical and unworkable precedent”
• “We believe that a prosecutor must be permitted to work with a grand jury totally free of the threat of civil suit.”
• “We believe that at the heart of the prosecutor’s job is the decision whether to prosecute . . . .”
• “[t]he alleged breach of the agreement not to prosecute, while not technically a plea bargain which would render the prosecutor’s immunity absolute ... is so closely analogous to a plea bargain that we think the same principle of absolute immunity applfies]”
• plea bargaining covered by prosecutorial immunity
• bright lines avoided in prior decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).