Skip to main content
· 8/8/2002

Annod Corp. v. Hamilton & Samuels

Citations

  • 123 Cal. Rptr. 2d 924
  • 100 Cal. App. 4th 1286
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7250
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 9099
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 4490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the fraudulent conveyance statute employs \the language of deliberate wrongful conduct\
  • focusing on evidence that the payments made were substantially less than previous draws, represented undermarket values for the services performed, and were consistent with the partner's significant efforts to increase funds available to creditors
  • in \considering the enumerated 'badges of fraud' the 'court should evaluate all the relevant circumstances involving a challenged transfer' and 'may appropriately take into account all indicia negativing as well as those suggesting fraud'\
  • no triable issue of fact, despite three factors of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.