Ankerman v. Mancuso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing the trial court determination that the business transaction rule served as a special defense and barred the enforcement of a note held by an attorney and secured by a mortgage on property belonging to the attorney’s client

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Guest v. Allstate Insurance
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-02-17· cited 24×
• Ankerman v. Mancuso
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-11-16· cited 12×
• Ankerman v. Mancuso
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-11-04· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mozzochi v. Beck
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 240×
• Gagne v. Vaccaro
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-03-06· cited 115×
• Noble v. Marshall
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-09-11· cited 60×
• Statewide Grievance Committee v. Botwick
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-07-06· cited 51×
• Dorsey v. Mancuso
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1990-12-18· cited 41×
• Hultman v. Blumenthal
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-01-15· cited 22×
• Leavenworth v. Mathes
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1995-07-18· cited 18×
• Mattson v. Mattson
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-24· cited 17×
• Dorsey v. Mancuso
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-02-07· cited 14×
• Standish v. Sotavento Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2000-07-18· cited 11×
• Roach v. Ivari International Centers, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-05-27· cited 9×