Ankerman v. Mancuso

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct was not “legally sufficient to preclude the enforcement” of a note and mortgage on a property
• defining promissory notes as a “written contract for the payment of money,” and a mortgage as a “conveyance of title to property that is given as security for the payment of a debt”
• rephrasing certified issue to reflect more precisely issue after reviewing record and briefs
• court may rephrase certified questions in order to render them more accurate in framing issues that case presents
• ‘‘[a] promissory note is simply a written contract for the payment of money’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• court may rephrase certified question to render it more accurate in framing issue presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).