Second Circuit· 3/9/2022
Anilao v. Spota
Citations
- 27 F.4th 855
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that absolute immunity applies “as long as a prosecutor acts with colorable authority. . . regardless of motivation”
- holding that the plaintiff’s claim that “his neighbors’ complaints which led to the charges were false” were “insufficient” to show bad faith or harassment, and did not “overcome the presumption that federal courts should not interfere in ongoing state court matters”
- holding that the plaintiff’s claim that “his neighbors’ complaints which led to the charges were false” were “insufficient” to show bad faith or harassment, and did not “overcome the presumption that federal courts should not interfere in ongoing state court matters”
- stating that district court correctly determined, based on the pleadings, that Spota and subordinate prosecutor “were not entitled to absolute immunity for their conduct during the investigative stage of the prosecution”
- rejecting a claim of county liability for the conduct of county prosecutors because “there was no evidence of a constitutional violation” at the investigative stage
- noting that the “law does not require a malicious prosecution plaintiff to prove his innocence, or even that the termination of the criminal proceeding was indicative of innocence . . . [the] burden is to demonstrate a final termination that is not inconsistent with innocence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court· 1978-06-06· cited 41,449×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court· 2009-01-21· cited 13,928×
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court· 1976-03-02· cited 7,274×
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1986-03-05· cited 6,748×
- Ziglar v. AbbasiSupreme Court· 2017-06-19· cited 2,879×
- Buckley v. FitzsimmonsSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 2,450×
- Gregoire v. BiddleSecond Circuit· 1949-10-24· cited 876×
- Van de Kamp v. GoldsteinSupreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 855×
- Kenneth O. Ashelman v. Hon. Gary Pope, Judge Division I, Mohave County Superior Court Mohave County Attorney's OfficeNinth Circuit· 1986-08-12· cited 821×
- Frank X. Losacco v. City of Middletown, Sebastian J. Garafalo, George Aylward, Joseph Bibisi, John Chowaniec, and Relford WardSecond Circuit· 1995-12-05· cited 817×
- Howard E. Mandell v. The County of Suffolk and John Gallagher, Police CommissionerSecond Circuit· 2003-01-17· cited 669×
- Lore v. City of SyracuseSecond Circuit· 2012-02-02· cited 573×
- R.G. Group, Inc., and R.G. Restaurant Associates v. The Horn & Hardart Company, and Bojangles' of America, Inc.Second Circuit· 1984-12-11· cited 496×
- United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 483×
- Kulwicki v. DawsonThird Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 452×
- Ricciuti v. N.Y.C. Transit AuthoritySecond Circuit· 1997-08-21· cited 409×
- People v. Calbud, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1980-02-14· cited 377×
- Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthoritySecond Circuit· 2012-12-21· cited 376×
- Segal v. City Of New YorkSecond Circuit· 2006-08-03· cited 324×
Other cases named Anilao v. Spota
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.