Andursky v. Andursky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• private agreements for support are governed by the law of contract and are enforceable in an action in assumpsit or equity by specific performance; private agreements and court-imposed orders are enforceable in distinct fashions and governed by distinguishing principles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Weir v. Weir
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-09-03· cited 55×
• In re Adoption of W.C.K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-03-06· cited 38×
• Riffenburg v. Riffenburg
  Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 1991-01-16· cited 31×
• Sorace v. Sorace
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-14· cited 17×
• Nessa v. Nessa
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-10-23· cited 15×
• Peck v. Peck
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-03-06· cited 11×
• Swartz v. Swartz
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-02-06· cited 10×
• Soll v. Soll
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-10-29· cited 7×
• Zittle v. Zittle
  York County Court of Common Pleas· 1989-08-08

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sonder v. Sonder
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-09-29· cited 126×
• Dechter v. Kaskey
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-10-21· cited 20×
• Bolus v. United Penn Bank
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-07· cited 5×