Andrews v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding § 43.21(a)(4) is overbroad as written
• holding § 43.21(a)(4) is overbroad as written
• court’s charge defining patently offensive in terms of statute is reversible error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Andrews v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-06-22· cited 103×
• Gholson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1984-01-06· cited 29×
• Shelton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-20· cited 10×
• Hoyle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-04-06· cited 8×
• Staten v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1985-01-24· cited 8×