Skip to main content

Andrews v. Stallings

Citations

  • 892 P.2d 611
  • 119 N.M. 478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statements in an article specifically directed at “ ‘the village’s appearance of impropriety’ ” did not concern the individual plaintiffs
  • holding that plaintiffs must plead alleged defamatory statements with precision
  • stating that characterizing problems at motorcycle rally as a “big deal” not actionable because not provable as false
  • stating that \[t]o recover for the intentional infliction of emotional distress\ a plaintiff must show that the defendant's conduct was extreme and outrageous, and was done recklessly or with the intent to cause severe emotional distress
  • holding plaintiffs must plead alleged defamatory statements with precision
  • characterizing problems as a “big deal” cannot be proved false, so statement not actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Alarid, Hartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.