Andrews v. Florida Parole Com'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Florida parole commission “fimctions in a quasi-judicial capacity in carrying out its duties under the [parole] statute[s]”
• holding that the parole commission acted within the scope of its quasi-judicial duties and therefore had judicial immunity when it placed an inmate on conditional release
• ”[F]alse imprisonment and false arrest are essentially the same tort[.]”
• parole board conducts quasi-judicial functions in carrying out its statutory duties
• false arrest and false imprisonment are “essentially the same tort”
• decisions by the Parole Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).