Andrade v. Aerotek, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the plaintiff’s counts “legally insufficient because [he] neglect[ed] to allege anywhere in his complaint that the debt at issue is a consumer debt, as is required to prevail under the FDCPA”
• “[Whether or not the ‘contract’ was attached to the complaint, and whether or not the Defendants had possession of the ‘contract’ at the time the suit was filed, does not constitute a violation of the FDCPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).