Grissom v. the Mills Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party’who achieved a favorable resolution pursuant to an offer of judgment was a prevailing party for purposes of determining attorney’s fees eligibility
• holding that, under'the Rule 68 offer of judgment in the case, plaintiff was entitled to attorney’s fees up to the date of the offer
• holding that a party who achieved a favorable resolution pursuant to an offer of judgment was a prevailing party for purposes of determining attorney’s fees eligibility
• holding that evidence of attorneys’ rates solely within the firm was insufficient to support the award
• holding that plaintiff did not satisfy their burden when, among other defects, double-digit annual hourly rate increases “[could not] simply be attributed to economic inflation for the same time periods.”
• holding that prevailing-hourly-rate evidence was insufficient to support attorney’s fee award where, among other things, increases in hourly rates charged by counsel exceeded economic inflation for the same time periods

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).