Anderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although under Pardo trial court must conduct section 90.403 analysis, appellant did not preserve that issue for appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Reynolds v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-20· cited 12×
• Bass v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 5×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Pardo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-03-26· cited 289×
• Allison v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-04-28· cited 31×
• Kopko v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-04-18· cited 12×
• State v. Pardo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-09· cited 12×