Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 467 So. 2d 781
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial counsel is not deemed ineffective bécause of strategic decisions made during trial
  • “In addition, counsel must weigh whether a mistrial at this point would be in the client’s best interests given his assessment of the likelihood of an acquittal.”
  • \The preservation of error rule [under any other approach to Strickland] would have no real consequence as it would apply only when counsel failed to preserve points which would not have merited a reversal in any event.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hubbart, Baskin and Jorgenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.