Anderson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in camera review of prosecutor's file is not necessary if the defendant did not identify the materiality or favorable nature of the evidence sought
• in camera review of prosecutor’s file is not necessary if the defendant did not identify the materiality or favorable nature of the evidence sought
• testimony material to show defendant’s clothing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Stanaway
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1994-08-29· cited 494×
• Ellison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-08· cited 41×
• Lebis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-04· cited 7×
• Pettis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-12-17· cited 2×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Driggers v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-09-07· cited 126×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1979-01-24· cited 89×
• Stevens v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1978-09-05· cited 81×
• Orkin v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-01-27· cited 75×
• Mitchell v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-02-11· cited 63×
• Blalock v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-01-04· cited 33×
• Wilson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1987-09-09· cited 30×
• Chastain v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1986-05-09· cited 28×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1989-09-11· cited 20×
• Goode v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1984-09-04· cited 10×
• Kress v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-04· cited 8×
• Cooper v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1972-06-15· cited 8×
• McKeever v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-06-21· cited 5×
• Holland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-06· cited 4×
• Valdez v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-06-20· cited 4×