Skip to main content
· 12/16/1974

Anderson v. Sawyer

Citations

  • 329 A.2d 716
  • 23 Md. App. 612
  • 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • lay witness testimony about “traffic congestion” concerns did not rebut qualified traffic expert’s testimony that street was capable of absorbing traffic increase created by proposal
  • disciplinary proceeding against attorney for professional misconductd lacks essential element of cause of action for malicious prosecution, or its civil analogue
  • more than a scintilla of evidence is required to make an issue fairly debatable
  • “The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
  • “The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
  • where the zoning body denied a special exception for a funeral home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Moylan and Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.