· 12/16/1974
Anderson v. Sawyer
Citations
- 329 A.2d 716
- 23 Md. App. 612
- 1974 Md. App. LEXIS 315
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- lay witness testimony about “traffic congestion” concerns did not rebut qualified traffic expert’s testimony that street was capable of absorbing traffic increase created by proposal
- disciplinary proceeding against attorney for professional misconductd lacks essential element of cause of action for malicious prosecution, or its civil analogue
- more than a scintilla of evidence is required to make an issue fairly debatable
- “The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
- “The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
- where the zoning body denied a special exception for a funeral home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, Moylan and Davidson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.