Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 12/16/1974

Anderson v. Sawyer

Citations

329 A.2d 716
23 Md. App. 612
1974 Md. App. LEXIS 315

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

lay witness testimony about “traffic congestion” concerns did not rebut qualified traffic expert’s testimony that street was capable of absorbing traffic increase created by proposal
disciplinary proceeding against attorney for professional misconductd lacks essential element of cause of action for malicious prosecution, or its civil analogue
more than a scintilla of evidence is required to make an issue fairly debatable
“The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
“The conditional use or special exception is a part of the comprehensive zoning plan sharing the presumption that, as such, it is in the interest of the general welfare, and therefore, valid.”
where the zoning body denied a special exception for a funeral home

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Moylan and Davidson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.