Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the words “all uses” in a zoning ordinance did not mean every lot was required to satisfy a minimum acreage requirement
• concluding the words “all uses” in a zoning ordinance did not mean every lot was required to satisfy a minimum acreage requirement
• finding that the words “all uses” in a zoning ordinance did not' mean every lot was required to satisfy a minimum acreage requirement
• concluding the words “all uses” in a zoning ordinance did not mean every lot was required to satisfy a minimum acreage requirement
• finding that the words “all uses” in a zoning ordinance did not mean every lot was required to satisfy a minimum acreage requirement
• “Simply stated, a board of adjustment cannot disregard the provisions of, nor exceed the power conferred by, a zoning ordinance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).