Anderson v. Hale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recording telephone calls without disclosing as much violates Local Rule 83.58.4(a)(4), which like Rule 8.4(c) prohibits “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentations”
• recording telephone calls without disclosing as much violates Local Rule 83.58.4(a)(4), which like Rule 8.4(c) prohibits “dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allen v. Sybase, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-10-25· cited 132×
• In Re Prb Docket No. 2007-046
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-11-25· cited 12×
• In re PRB Docket No. 2007-046 and In re PRB Docket No. 2007-047
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2009-11-25

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Charles Kruger v. Kenneth S. Apfel
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-05-10· cited 119×
• United States v. Harry Ronald Frans, United States of America v. James J. Arrajj, Jr.
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-01-06· cited 42×
• Anderson v. Hale
  N.D. Illinois· 2001-04-23· cited 11×
• Barbara McFarlane v. Life Insurance Company of North America
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-07-19· cited 8×