United States v. Harry Ronald Frans, United States of America v. James J. Arrajj, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant had not made a showing of \bad motives of the government\ and that \a defendant must make a sub- stantial evidentiary showing that the government intended to distort the judicial fact-finding process\ before the court will review a denial of immunity
• \[W]e have implied that review [of refusal to grant immunity] may be proper if there is a clear abuse of discretion violating the due process clause.\
• \[W]e have implied that review [of refusal to grant immunity] may be proper if there is a clear abuse of discretion violating the due process clause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).