Anderson v. Anderson
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 4415
Syllabus
The trial court's classification of unvested restricted stock units as marital property was not against the manifest weight of the evidence because there was competent, credible evidence that the restricted stock units were granted to the husband by his employer for his performance during the marriage. Additionally, it was not an abuse of discretion for the trial court to divide the property equally between the parties.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- Briganti v. BrigantiOhio Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 241×
- Neville v. NevilleOhio Supreme Court· 2003-07-23· cited 156×
- Daniel v. Daniel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-03-26· cited 23×
- McCarty v. McCartyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-17· cited 9×
- Binks v. BinksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-07· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.