Anchondo v. Corrections Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law-enforcement officer under the NMTCA
• holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law-enforcement officer under the NMTCA
• holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law enforcement officer under Tort Claims Act
• holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law enforcement officer under the NMTCA
• concluding that because corrections officials’ primary duties and responsibilities were administrative and did not involve the “traditional duties” of law enforcement officers, they did not fall within § 41-4-12’s definition
• secretary of corrections department and warden of state penitentiary, which does not confine persons accused of crime, not included

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).