New Mexico Supreme Court· 6/10/1983
Anchondo v. Corrections Department
Citations
- 666 P.2d 1255
- 100 N.M. 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law-enforcement officer under the NMTCA
- holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law-enforcement officer under the NMTCA
- holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law enforcement officer under Tort Claims Act
- holding that the Secretary of Corrections and the Warden of a state penitentiary are not law enforcement officer under the NMTCA
- concluding that because corrections officials’ primary duties and responsibilities were administrative and did not involve the “traditional duties” of law enforcement officers, they did not fall within § 41-4-12’s definition
- secretary of corrections department and warden of state penitentiary, which does not confine persons accused of crime, not included
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stowers, Payne, Sosa, Federici, Riordan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Silva v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1987-11-03· cited 162×
- Schlieter v. CarlosNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 74×
- Lymon v. Aramark Corp.D. New Mexico· 2010-07-07· cited 73×
- Callaway v. New Mexico Department of CorrectionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-03-29· cited 65×
- Weinstein v. City of Santa Fe Ex Rel. Santa Fe Police DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1996-04-01· cited 60×
- Begay v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-12-10· cited 56×
- Abalos v. Bernalillo County District Attorney's OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-17· cited 54×
- Wittkowski Ex Rel. Wittkowski v. State, Corrections DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-11-14· cited 49×
- Davis v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-07-13· cited 47×
- Vigil Ex Rel. Estate of Vigil v. MartinezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-03-18· cited 38×
- Dunn v. McFeeleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1999-04-28· cited 38×
- Rivera v. KingNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-10-18· cited 35×
- Coyazo v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-05-02· cited 34×
- Fernandez v. Mora-San Miguel Electric Cooperative, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2006-08-29· cited 16×
- Baptiste v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-02-10· cited 16×
- Hern v. CristNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-02-04· cited 15×
- Salazar v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2011-03-28· cited 13×
- Rayos v. State Ex Rel. New Mexico Department of Corrections, Adult Probation & Parole DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2014-07-15· cited 12×
- Williams ex rel. Samayoa v. Board of RegentsD. New Mexico· 2014-04-29· cited 12×
- Farris v. MoeckelD. Delaware· 1987-07-02· cited 11×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Methola v. County of EddyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 125×
- State v. LinamNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-01-11· cited 63×
- Kimball v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-04-06· cited 25×
- State v. GrantNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1968-07-18· cited 22×
- Lowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1974-11-26· cited 21×
- State v. RheaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1980-03-17· cited 9×
- Schalk v. Department of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-10-23· cited 4×
- Bush v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-02-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.