Rivera v. King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to amend 30 1 when motion was made five years after the original complaint, hearing on motion was 2 held one month before trial, and party failed to explain how she was prejudiced by the 3 denial
• where matters outside pleadings are presented in support of motion to dismiss, the motion is treated as one for summary judgment
• “Motions to amend are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and will be reversed on appeal only for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).