Fourth Circuit· 3/30/2021

Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV

Citations

993 F.3d 208

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that the court “need not address plaintiffs’ claims as to the adequacy of existing processes[]” when plaintiffs fail to demonstrate infringement of constitutional interests
noting that “framing” is “important”
“We find these decisions persuasive and decline the invitation to create a circuit split.”
“We find these decisions persuasive and decline the invitation to create a circuit split.”
“Because we conclude that plaintiffs have not demonstrated infringements of constitutional liberty interests under the Due Process Clause, we need not address plaintiffs’ claims as to the adequacy of existing processes.”
“The federal government’s intragovernmental dissemination of TSDB information to other federal agencies and components, to be used for federal law enforcement purposes, is not ‘public disclosure’ for purposes of a stigma-plus claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.