Amy v. Watertown
Citations
- 130 U.S. 320
- 9 S. Ct. 537
- 32 L. Ed. 953
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1752
Syllabus
<p>The general rule respecting' statutes of limitation is that the language of the act must prevail, and that no reason based on apparent inconvenience or hardship will justify a departure from it.</p> <p>Cases considered in which courts of equity and some courts of law have held that the running of the statute was suspended on the ground of fraud. Cases considered in which courts of law have held the operation of the statute suspended for want of parties, or because the law prohibits the bringing of an action.</p> <p>Inability to serve process upon a defendant, caused by his designed elusion of it, is no excuse for not commencing an action within the prescribed period.</p>
Judges: Bradley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- TRW Inc. v. AndrewsSupreme Court· 2001-11-13· cited 1,407×
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-03-04· cited 393×
- Gabelli v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 282×
- Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court· 1893-03-06· cited 147×
- Lamb v. Powder River Live Stock Co.Eighth Circuit· 1904-09-05· cited 68×
- Corona Coal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1924-01-14· cited 55×
- Chung Fook v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1924-04-07· cited 50×
- Seamans v. WalgrenWashington Supreme Court· 1973-09-13· cited 39×
- Ennis v. Pullman Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1896-11-09· cited 30×
- Morgan v. City of Des MoinesEighth Circuit· 1894-02-12· cited 29×
- PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court· 1951-11-14· cited 28×
- Bates v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-06-01· cited 27×
- Versluis v. Town of Haskell, Okl.Tenth Circuit· 1946-03-25· cited 26×
- Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court· 1895-10-11· cited 24×
- Singleton v. ClashS.D. New York· 2013-07-01· cited 18×
- Hensen v. PeterWashington Supreme Court· 1917-04-13· cited 17×
- Mereness v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa· 1900-10-04· cited 17×
- Texas Rice Land Co. v. McFaddin, Wiess & Kyle Land Co.Texas Commission of Appeals· 1924-11-12· cited 16×
- United States v. GanaposkiM.D. Pennsylvania· 1947-09-02· cited 15×
- Federated Capital Corp. v. LibbyUtah Supreme Court· 2016-09-06· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.