D. Massachusetts· 5/19/1986
Amtrol, Inc. v. Vent-Rite Valve Corp.
Citations
- 646 F. Supp. 1168
- 55 U.S.L.W. 2260
- 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25337
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where a court obtains jurisdiction over defendant pursuant to extraterritorial service of process provision of Clayton Act, it may also exercise jurisdiction over that defendant with respect to state law claims arising out of a common nucleus of operative facts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Young
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Go-Video, Inc. v. Akai Electric Company, Ltd., and Matsushita Electric Industrial Company, Ltd.Ninth Circuit· 1989-09-05· cited 129×
- In Re Acushnet River & New Bedford Harbor Proceedings Re Alleged PCB PollutionD. Massachusetts· 1987-11-06· cited 48×
- Doe v. Unocal Corp.C.D. California· 1998-11-18· cited 32×
- General Cigar Holdings, Inc. v. Altadis, S.A.S.D. Florida· 2002-06-12· cited 26×
- Anderson v. Century Products Co.D. New Hampshire· 1996-10-23· cited 23×
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationD. Maine· 2004-03-04· cited 22×
- Nahigian v. LeonardD. Massachusetts· 2002-11-22· cited 21×
- Whistler Corp. v. Solar Electronics, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1988-04-25· cited 19×
- Home Owners Funding Corp. of America v. Century Bk.D. Massachusetts· 1988-09-30· cited 19×
- Narco Avionics, Inc. v. Sportsman's Market, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-06-23· cited 15×
- Salpoglou v. SHLOMO WIDDER, MD, PAD. Massachusetts· 1995-09-26· cited 8×
- In Re Lernout & Hauspie Securities LitigationD. Massachusetts· 2004-09-08· cited 7×
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationD. Maine· 2004-09-07· cited 2×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Spencer Pharmaceutical Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2014-11-14· cited 2×
- Petedge, Inc. v. Fortress Secure Solutions, LLCD. Massachusetts· 2015-11-17· cited 2×
- Filler v. LernoutD. Massachusetts· 2004-09-08· cited 2×
- Riley v. Harr, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2000-03-31
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court· 1984-04-24· cited 6,200×
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,488×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-03-20· cited 2,597×
- Blue Shield of Va. v. McCreadySupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 680×
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 324×
- Parks v. WatsonNinth Circuit· 1983-09-22· cited 140×
- Hecht v. Pro-Football, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1977-12-20· cited 128×
- Grip-Pak, Inc. v. Illinois Tool Works, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1983-01-12· cited 121×
- Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.First Circuit· 1984-09-06· cited 105×
- Losego v. Guernsey County Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 78×
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.S.D. New York· 1964-06-23· cited 72×
- S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.D. Massachusetts· 1979-01-17· cited 65×
- Aro Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Automobile Body Research CorporationFirst Circuit· 1965-11-09· cited 59×
- Driver v. HelmsFirst Circuit· 1978-05-25· cited 49×
- Robinson v. Penn Central Co.Third Circuit· 1973-06-29· cited 45×
- Petros A. Palandjian v. Ashraf PahlaviFirst Circuit· 1986-01-30· cited 33×
- Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 1975-08-12· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.