Skip to main content
· 6/29/2001

AMB Property, L.P. v. MTS, Inc.

Citations

  • 551 S.E.2d 102
  • 250 Ga. App. 513
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2143
  • 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 744

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • pricing provision that is undisputably vague or indefinite is not ambiguous; it is 12 unenforceable
  • pricing provision that is undisputably vague or indefinite is not ambiguous; it is unenforceable
  • “The concept of severability refers to striking a distinct part [of a contract and allowing the remainder to stand], not to excising certain language contained in a single provision.”
  • “The question then becomes whether the court could excise the indefinite language and still pre- serve the language regarding the last year’s base rent as the sole controlling language for determining the rent for the renewal term.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Andrews, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.