Croxton v. MSC Holding, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an employee’s separate employment contract operated to allow the employee/shareholder to pursue a claim for breach of contract rather than via a dissenter’s rights action
• shareholder’s complaint not essentially a “complaint about price” and he was not restricted to statutory appraisal proceeding
• shareholder's complaint not essentially a \complaint about price\ and he was not restricted to statutory appraisal proceeding
• absent unmistakable waiver, the law will not infer waiver of rights given by an employment contract where these are rights upon which the employee conditioned his or her agreement to accept employment
• “the greater of” means that the set value is the minimum price
• “A motion to dismiss may be granted only where a complaint shows with certainty that the plaintiff would not be entitled to relief under any state of facts that could be proven in support of his claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).