Skip to main content

Amarillas v. White

Citations

  • 253 Or. App. 754
  • 292 P.3d 587
  • 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the respondent recklessly failed to be aware that his contacts were unwanted
  • concluding that the respondent recklessly failed to be aware that his contacts were unwanted
  • conclud- ing that, even though the petitioner voluntarily continued to work with the respondent after a rift, that did not preclude subsequent threats from qualifying as unwanted contacts
  • conclud- ing that, even though the petitioner voluntarily continued to work with the respondent after a rift, that did not preclude subsequent threats from qualifying as unwanted contacts
  • the trial court did not err in finding that, even though the petitioner continued to work with the respon- dent after a rift, the respondent’s later physical threats were unwanted contacts
  • the trial court did not err in finding that, even though the petitioner continued to work with the respon- dent after a rift, the respondent’s later physical threats were unwanted contacts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hadlock, Ortega, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.