Federal Claims· 5/27/2010
Alpha I, L.P. v. United States
Citations
- 93 Fed. Cl. 280
- 105 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 2724
- 2010 U.S. Claims LEXIS 265
- 2010 WL 2197788
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “At the summary judgment stage, the underlying information, rather than the form of the information, must be admissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hewitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Yung v. Grant Thornton, LLPMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 38×
- Salem Financial, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2013-09-20· cited 9×
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2012-01-30· cited 4×
- ALPHA I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-09-14· cited 1×
- Haggar v. United StatesD. South Dakota· 2011-02-23
- Marine Industrial Construction, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2020-12-29
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2021-01-08
Cites
62 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- Deputy, Administratrix v. Du PontSupreme Court· 1940-01-08· cited 2,467×
- United States v. BoyleSupreme Court· 1985-01-09· cited 1,888×
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1985-10-16· cited 787×
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- Carlos and Jacqueline Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Joseph, Jr. And Anastasia Marcello v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueFifth Circuit· 1967-08-29· cited 588×
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1984-03-26· cited 470×
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-09-30· cited 260×
- Kenneth Allen Barbara Allen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1991-02-06· cited 232×
- Coast Federal Bank, Fsb v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2003-03-24· cited 222×
- C. Sanchez and Son, Incorporated v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1993-10-05· cited 186×
- Commissioner v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1958-03-17· cited 152×
- William J. Gass v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1969-01-29· cited 141×
- Westbrook v. CommissionerFifth Circuit· 1995-10-27· cited 140×
- Leonard L. Bursten v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1968-05-27· cited 114×
- 20th Century Wear, Inc., Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Sanmark-Stardust Inc. And Domino Industries, Inc., Appellants-Cross-AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1984-10-18· cited 105×
- Klamath Strategic Investment Fund Ex Rel. St. Croix Ventures v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2009-05-22· cited 102×
- United States v. Jean Charles Rochan, Andre Ethier and Serge BrochuFifth Circuit· 1977-12-01· cited 101×
Other cases named Alpha I, L.P. v. United States
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-08-28· cited 12×
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-11-25· cited 12×
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-10-09· cited 4×
- ALPHA I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-09-14· cited 1×
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2013-12-09
- Alpha I, L.P. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-12-09
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.