Alliance Against IFQs v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Individual Fishing Quota regulations were a permissible exer- cise of agency authority to prevent fishery depletion
• holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen alone does not make a plan arbitrary and capricious
• holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen who have done nothing wrong is an unavoidable consequence of the statutory scheme
• holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen alone does not make a plan arbitrary and capricious
• holding that Individual Fishing Quota regulations were a permissible exer- cise of agency authority to prevent fishery depletion
• holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen who have done nothing wrong is an unavoidable consequence of the statutory scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).