Ninth Circuit· 5/22/1996
Alliance Against IFQs v. Brown
Citations
- 84 F.3d 343
- 96 Daily Journal DAR 5828
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3590
- 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11676
- 1996 WL 268359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Individual Fishing Quota regulations were a permissible exer- cise of agency authority to prevent fishery depletion
- holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen alone does not make a plan arbitrary and capricious
- holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen who have done nothing wrong is an unavoidable consequence of the statutory scheme
- holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen alone does not make a plan arbitrary and capricious
- holding that Individual Fishing Quota regulations were a permissible exer- cise of agency authority to prevent fishery depletion
- holding that an adverse impact on the lives of fishermen who have done nothing wrong is an unavoidable consequence of the statutory scheme
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Kleinfeld, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Associated Fisheries of Maine, Inc. v. DaleyFirst Circuit· 1997-09-16· cited 202×
- North Carolina Fisheries Ass'n, Inc. v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia· 2007-08-17· cited 86×
- Washington v. DaleyNinth Circuit· 1999-04-02· cited 81×
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. BlankNinth Circuit· 2012-09-10· cited 42×
- Tempest Fisheries v. LockeFirst Circuit· 2012-11-28· cited 34×
- Pacific Dawn LLC v. Penny PritzkerNinth Circuit· 2016-08-03· cited 31×
- Oregon Trollers Ass'n v. GutierrezNinth Circuit· 2006-07-05· cited 27×
- Fishermen's Finest, Inc. v. LockeNinth Circuit· 2010-01-19· cited 26×
- Charter Operators v. BlankD.C. Circuit· 2012-02-24· cited 25×
- California Cosmetology Coalition American Association of Cosmetology Schools v. Richard W. Riley, Secretary of EducationNinth Circuit· 1997-04-11· cited 22×
- National Coalition for Marine Conservation v. EvansDistrict of Columbia· 2002-10-31· cited 20×
- American Oceans Campaign v. DaleyDistrict of Columbia· 2000-09-24· cited 19×
- Yakutat, Inc. v. GutierrezNinth Circuit· 2005-05-18· cited 18×
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2014-10-14· cited 17×
- Oceana, Inc. v. PritzkerDistrict of Columbia· 2014-03-10· cited 16×
- Wards Cove Packing Corporation v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceNinth Circuit· 2002-10-15· cited 14×
- Center for Biological Diversity v. BrysonDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-28· cited 12×
- Norbird Fisheries, Inc., Dba Ptarmigan F/v v. The National Marine Fisheries ServiceNinth Circuit· 1997-04-25· cited 11×
- VAN VALIN v. LockeDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-23· cited 10×
- Battley v. Schmitz (In Re Schmitz)D. Alaska· 1998-07-28· cited 9×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Brock v. Pierce CountySupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 393×
- Richard Atwood v. Newmont Gold Co., Inc., a Delaware CorporationNinth Circuit· 1995-01-18· cited 225×
- Audrey M. Thompson, Florence Ain & Gregory Ain, Dorothy E. Kahan & Robert Kahan, Nana Berman & William Berman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1980-11-03· cited 136×
- Alaska Factory Trawler Ass'n v. BaldridgeNinth Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 41×
- Washington Crab Producers, Inc. v. MosbacherNinth Circuit· 1991-01-25· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.