Allergia, Inc. v. Bouboulis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that a court must not invade a jury's exclusive role as factfinder
• reversing the grant of summary judgment on a claim A-4625-19 3 brought under the Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to -224, based on similar assertions made by the plaintiff in that case
• noting expressions of opinion usually cannot form the basis for a fraud claim
• educational and vocational training program governed by the CFA because the program was not overseen by any regulatory body and there were no regulations governing the school that would present \a patent and sharp\ conflict with the CFA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).