Indiana Court of Appeals· 11/13/2003
Allen v. State
Citations
- 798 N.E.2d 490
- 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 2111
- 2003 WL 22671569
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the evidence used to establish possession was found in close proximity to items owned by the defendant, giving rise to the inference that the defendant intended to maintain dominion and control over the evidence
- \[O]ur supreme court has previously held that eyewitnesses and crime victims are considered presumptively reliable unless circumstances exist which call into question their credibility.\
- eyewitness testimony and police investigation revealed sufficient evidence for the magistrate to conclude that there was a fair probability that firearms would be found at the suspect’s home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Friedlander, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2004-06-17· cited 89×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-04-27· cited 44×
- Massey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-29· cited 36×
- Mehring v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-15· cited 36×
- Powell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-09-08· cited 27×
- Thomas Mack v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 26×
- Loren H. Fry v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2015-02-04· cited 17×
- State v. ShaonMissouri Court of Appeals· 2004-10-05· cited 16×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-02-22· cited 16×
- Scruggs v. Allen County/City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-28· cited 15×
- Halferty v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-09· cited 14×
- Rader v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2010-08-24· cited 13×
- E.D. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2009-05-04· cited 11×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-06-07· cited 8×
- Robert E. Redington v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-08-06· cited 6×
- Shawn McBride v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2018-02-13· cited 4×
- Daniel Sparks v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2018-04-18· cited 2×
- State v. SpillersIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-13· cited 2×
- Percifield v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-09-10· cited 1×
- Levenduski v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2007-11-21· cited 1×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1976-06-29· cited 1,306×
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-16· cited 191×
- Houser v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1997-02-26· cited 134×
- Pawloski v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-10-10· cited 99×
- Iddings v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-12· cited 85×
- Goliday v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1999-03-19· cited 84×
- Maul v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2000-06-30· cited 83×
- Cox v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-17· cited 82×
- Davenport v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-06· cited 70×
- Rhinehardt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-30· cited 64×
- Martin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1978-02-21· cited 59×
- Alspach v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2001-09-11· cited 57×
- Query v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2001-04-11· cited 55×
- Payne v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-10-25· cited 47×
- Ladd v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-26· cited 45×
- Hensley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-11-15· cited 39×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-27· cited 38×
- Nash v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-04-07· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.