Ninth Circuit· 3/13/2002

Allen v. Iranon

Citations

283 F.3d 1070
2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2337
18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 830
2002 Daily Journal DAR 2887
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 3892

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an “eleven-month gap in time is within the range that has been found to support an inference [of] retaliatory [motive]”
holding an 11-month gap between the protected speech and denial of a government benefit “is within the range that has been found to support an inference than an employment decision was retaliatory.”
explaining that the clear error standard is significantly deferential, and that this court would “accept the lower court’s findings of fact” unless this court is left with a “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed”
noting Graning conflicts with cases from the First, Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits
“[A]n eleven- 9 month gap in time is within the range that has been found to support an inference that an 10 employment decision was retaliatory.”
“Courts determining whether a plaintiff has met his burden . . . often look to evidence that the employer’s proffered reasons for the challenged decision were pretextual.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.