Allen v. Allen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[r]ecital of consideration in an unsealed instrument may be contradicted by parol evidence” that no payment was actually made

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Peters Grazing Association v. Legerski
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1975-12-24· cited 58×
• 3511 13th Street Tenants' Ass'n v. 3511 13th Street, N.W. Residences, LLC
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-04-19· cited 22×
• Riggs v. Aetna Insurance
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-01-12· cited 15×
• Vaccaro v. Andresen
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1964-06-04· cited 4×
• Luo v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-02-27

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Sloan v. Sloan
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1949-06-03· cited 6×